Tag Archives: Blogging

No Room for Nuance

Recently a colleague commented to me (in person) about something I’d said in one of my blog posts. What I had written was a bit of a throwaway line, and while it wasn’t inaccurate, his point was that it needed greater nuance. I agreed, and mentioned that I am more than happy for those kind of things to be pointed out in comments – I love getting responses and differing ideas to what I share! But I take his point that in this format it can be very difficult to offer a nuanced perspective without being seen as disagreeing with or undermining the wider point.

One of the challenges with blogging is keeping posts short and readable. What gets sacrificed is the ability to provide nuance, details, explanations, caveats. Obviously this is even more so with platforms like facebook or twitter – it’s very hard to leave room for nuance in 140 characters!

When what is written on a blog or tweet is seen as a thought starter or a distillation of key ideas, and there is space to reply, comment, question and interact, it’s a great format. The problem as I see it arises when ideas expressed in these forms are taken as full and final statements, or when we assume that what someone has said is the only thing they think about a topic, or that they are not open to further discussion, or that new information would not change their perspective.

What really bothers me, however, is that this inability to leave room for nuance seems to be taking over in our national political climate. We demand full and final answers from our leaders, but we demand them in catchy sound-bites. In response we get slogans instead of policies, and leaders who are trying to govern by living up to those slogans.

Don’t we want the leaders of our nation to be people of nuance? People who change their mind when they receive new information and evidence, people who understand complexity and varying perspectives? People who grow and develop in their thinking and practice?

When our national political debate is reduced to un-nuanced, simplistic slogans, I think we all suffer. I am reminded of a quote from my favourite fictional politician,  given in the context of a political debate where people are looking for a “ten word answer” which can form the headline or sound-bite for the next news cycle.

“Every once in a while, every once in a while, there’s a day with an absolute right and an absolute wrong, but those days almost always include body counts. Other than that, there aren’t very many un-nuanced moments in leading a country that’s way too big for ten words.”

President Josiah Bartlet, “Game On,” The West Wing

Photo by Marcia Reed NBC, via The West Wing Continuity Guide (Unofficial)
Photo by Marcia Reed, NBC, via The West Wing Continuity Guide (Unofficial)

What do you think? How can we make room for nuance, whether on social media or in political discourse?

Thinking Out Loud

I was told recently that I am an “external processor.” In other words, I think out loud. It is often in conversations with others that I discover what I really believe, consider how I understand the world, and make decisions about what I will do.

Having recently started my PhD full time, I suddenly find myself with a lot of space to think when nobody is around to talk to! I wondered (aloud of course) whether I would need to learn to talk to myself more. And then I realised, really, that’s what a blog is for, isn’t it?

I don’t intend this to be a blog about my studies, although I’m sure some of the thinking I am doing in that process will pop up from time to time. I’m interested in thinking about what I see happening in the world around me, how that intersects with my faith and my passions, and what I am learning from other people’s stories along the way. I imagine I will think aloud about theology, travel, politics, Jesus, chocolate, sexism, philosophy, justice, and the Bible, because those are some of the things that tend to occupy my mind and heart. I’m sure other topics will come up along the way.

Do I have something to say that other people want to listen to? That remains to be seen. I hope so. I am a teacher and preacher by calling, gifting and training, so it would be nice to think this is an avenue to use that passion as well. I have learned much from reading the musings and perspectives of others through their blogs, and so I hope to be able to reflect on and interact with what I am reading and at times contribute to those conversations as well.

Of course the danger with being a person who thinks out loud is that it can sometimes get you into trouble. I might be speaking in questions, possibilities, ideas and hypotheticals when someone else thinks I am giving my measured, reasoned and considered final opinion. Similarly, the danger of putting your thoughts on the internet is that they are out there for all to see and judge, debate and disagree with, hold you to and stereotype you by. No doubt that will happen here. I hope I can always be gracious to those with whom I disagree and to those who disagree with me. I pray for grace in return.

So, let the adventure in thinking out loud online begin…